Mindsets - a powerful concept for coaching, psychotherapy, parenting, and just plain living

I have just finished Carol Dweck’s “mindset” and found it very exciting. In a nutshell, the author suggests that we all fall into one of two mindsets - a “fixed” mindset or a “growth” mindset.

Those of us with a fixed mindset believe that talent and intelligence are fixed traits that people have or don’t have. Those with a growth mindset believe that effort plays a key role - the harder we try (if the effort is well-directed), the better we do. For those with a fixed mindset, getting an answer wrong, getting a bad grade, doing poorly at something, are proof of being untalented or dumb. For those with a growth mindset, setbacks are a chance to re-evaluate and try again.

Dweck gives many examples of famous people with each mindset. Some examples of the fixed mindset - John McEnroe and Lee Iacocca. Examples of a growth mindset - basketball coach John Wooden and Lou Gerstner.

I found it particularly fascinating that we can lead others toward a fixed mindset by praising their intelligence or talent rather than their effort. Kids who were told “you did really well on that test, you must be really smart” were less likely to try a more challenging problem than those with a growth mindset, fearing that they might not do as well and appear less smart.

In many clients I have seen in therapy and in coaching, self-doubts and fear of failure (or negative reactions to previous “failure”) have been significant issues. I’m beginning to look at how helping clients to move towards a growth, learning-oriented mindset can accelerate our progress together.

Ways to improve intimate relationships

A couple I know is going through marital difficulties and I put the following together until they can find a marriage counselor who can help them. I thought I would post it here in case it can help anyone else.

First, it appears that we are all “wired” biologically to want a close relationship with someone else. This appears to be a basic human need. When we think about closeness and intimacy, we tend to ask ourselves these questions, whether consciously or not:

- Can I count on you and depend on you?
- Are you there for me?
- Will you respond when I need you?

- Do I matter to you?
- Do you value me?
- Do you need me and depend on me

When the answers to these questions appear to be “no”, a part of our brain gets triggered that sends us into a sort of panic. For some people that panic will mean pulling away and withdrawing, as a strategy for trying to stay safe; for others it will mean reaching out for the other person in a way that may feel intrusive and dangerous to the other. Some of us will act like turtles, hiding in our shells, sure that it is dangerous to come out; others of us will turn into porcupines and it will feel dangerous when we come close. Neither the turtles nor the porcupines are likely to get the closeness that at least part of them desires - at least, not without some help.

This is some of the motivation behind a very typical cycle, where the more one person withdraws, the more the other pursues (sometimes in ways that can seem angry), and the more one pursues, the more the other withdraws. One of the keys to making progress is for each member of the couple to realize their typical pattern and that the pattern is a circle. It is much more important that the pattern exists and that the couple is in the middle of it than who started it.

We begin to learn from the time that we are babies what sort of answers to expect from someone who is close to us. Our first models are typically our parents. Along the way, we learn that

- we can basically count on significant others to make sure our needs are met, or

- we can’t count on significant others, and we should not even bother trying, or

- we can’t count on significant others, so we better keep after them

The good news is that, particularly with the sort of therapy I’ve learned (emotion-focused therapy for couples), patterns can change. The therapist can make sure that it becomes safe to share fears and vulnerabilities (which we all have and are often buried underneath what the fights seem to be about) with each other.

The therapist can help translate. “You are self-centered” might become, for example, “I’ve felt so alone and as though I don’t mean anything to you.” Whereas the first way might push our significant other way, the second way is more likely to bring them closer.

The way we fight about things, and our ability to get to the basic needs and fears behind the fights, end up being much more important than many of the things the fights seem to be about. One study found that 60% of the things that couples fought about at the beginning of the relationship were things happy couples that stayed together still disagreed about, years later. What helped these couples to stay together was, in large part, how they dealt with their disagreements.

One more finding that might be helpful - we now know that when people get too worked up during a fight (heart pounding, adrenaline rushing), it changes the way we think in a way that makes it pretty much impossible to have a reasonable discussion. When we recognize that we (or our partner) have reached that stage, the best thing is to go cool down (this can take at least 30 minutes) and re-schedule the discussion (not avoiding the discussion, re-scheduling it). It’s also useful to know that people who tend to withdraw may be getting quite worked up inside, but not show it. In some cases, they may not even be aware of it.

There are lots of ways to do couples therapy. Of course, I’m a big fan of the way I learned, emotion-focused therapy (EFT). There is information about it, and a therapist directory, at www.eft.ca. There is also a book called “Hold Me Tight” by the therapist who developed EFT. The book is written for couples and can be a great start to turning things around.

Research shows that 90% of couples improve after emotion-focused therapy and that 70% feel “cured.” Often, 8 - 20 sessions are enough and couples typically continue to improve after they have finished therapy. Interestingly, the amount of conflict in the couple did not appear to affect whether EFT was effective.

More about In Treatment

I found the couples therapy sessions in Season 1 the most painful to watch - not just because of the couple’s pain, but because of the way Paul worked with the couple.

So many times, Paul would watch the couple begin their pattern of mutual destruction, seemingly powerless to stop them and keep the therapy as a safe place to explore feelings. Of course, this is for TV, but I would not be surprised to find actual therapy sessions with a similar feeling. However, after the first few minutes of watching Jake and Amy’s “dance”, why not help them to slow down and understand the actual pattern they repeat so often, so they can begin to catch themselves in the act.

Why not help them to understand and share the more tender, vulnerable feelings underneath Amy’s aggression and Jake’s pulling away, so that they can develop more empathy for each other? Why not jump in with something like, “Jake, what happened just now? Can you tell Amy more about why you just turned away from her?” and “Amy, can you tell Jake about your reaction when he turned away? Perhaps, what you told yourself when you saw him do that?”

Perhaps less compelling TV, but if this were a true couples session, the way I prefer to work with couples, based on Sue Johnson’s Emotion-Focused Therapy (EFT), I wonder if they mightn’t have built on some of the tender feelings that slipped out from time to time and ended up in a happier place.

Thoughts about “In Treatment”

Beyond the more obvious ethical issues about Paul’s behavior on “In Treatment”, the show provides an interesting look at how differently therapists can address the same issues. Beyond plot devices, there are real differences in how Paul and I would work with the same clients.

Above all, Paul tends to tell people what he thinks they are thinking and feeling. This puts him in the role of “expert” about his clients. I much prefer to work as a partner and co-explorer with my clients. At most, I might wonder if one issue has to do with another and might ask my client’s opinion, but I would not presume to tell someone what they are thinking or feeling.

At the same time, I would be much more likely to explore feelings I think I’m noticing in my clients’ faces and bodies. There were a number of times when Sophie and others began to have tears in their eyes and rather than following the path of emotions, Paul would make a comment that would pull the client away from his or her feelings. In my training with AEDP, I’ve learned how healing it can be for clients to share their emotions in a safe settings. So many times, we’ve explored how different it is to cry alone from crying with a caring, understanding other.

More soon.

Thoughts about coaching and psychotherapy

I will be posting my thoughts about coaching, psychotherapy, and how the two evolving fields relate to each other, as well as commentary about books and articles I am reading.